Man accidentally gains control of 7k robot vacuums

(popsci.com)

57 points | by Brajeshwar 2 hours ago

9 comments

  • dlenski 10 minutes ago
    > he soon discovered that the same credentials that allowed him to see and control his own device also provided access to live camera feeds, microphone audio, maps, and status data from nearly 7,000 other vacuums across 24 countries.

    This is extremely similar to what I accidentally discovered and disclosed about Mysa smart thermostats last year: the same credentials could be used to access, inspect, and control all of them, anywhere in the world.

    See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43392991

  • MostlyStable 1 hour ago
    Anyone who's somewhat technically inclined should, in my opinion, only be buying valetudo [0] compatible vacuums and replacing the default software as soon as possible.

    [0] https://valetudo.cloud/

    • ericpauley 37 minutes ago
      I found the “Why Not Valetudo” page on that site extremely persuasive. I would consider myself technically inclined. I also own a robot vacuum so I can spend more time doing important things that leverage my skills. Valetudo does not serve this mission.

      Very impressive, but I disagree that this is the clear best choice for anywhere close to anyone.

      • misnome 20 minutes ago
        Also, the first line in "Why Valetudo?"

        > First of all, please do not try to convince people to use Valetudo.

        A good realist position for such a project to take.

  • RHSeeger 1 hour ago
    > In order for the Romo, or really any modern autonomous vacuum, to function it needs to constantly collect visual data from the building it is operating in.

    I specifically bought one without a camera or mic.

    • tgsovlerkhgsel 1 hour ago
      Are there any like that that would have automatic emptying?
      • valicord 1 hour ago
        Roborock q revo
        • arein3 1 minute ago
          Ive got a q revo pro, which can dry the mops.

          Happy with it but note that I dont have carpets, I guess for carpets you need something with more features.

        • bdcravens 43 minutes ago
          The Q Revo series does have a camera and mic.
          • izacus 38 minutes ago
            They don't, the camera equipped ones are the maxV series.

            Q Revo has an IR sensor which doesn't transmit that data anywhere.

            • bdcravens 17 minutes ago
              I had a Q Revo Edge that had a mic (it responded to "Hey Rocky" commands) and I could remotely view my house through the camera.

              Are you thinking of the S8 line? That's the one with the MaxV model.

    • sverhagen 1 hour ago
      How do you know? For sure, I mean?
      • soopypoos 49 minutes ago
        I wrapped mine in foil to be safe and now it's fabulous
      • brookst 1 hour ago
        I mean your coffee maker could be a one-off spy device with nation-state backing. But it seems unlikely.
        • soopypoos 5 minutes ago
          he did say he was trained at the kremlin…
        • skeeter2020 28 minutes ago
          if they can build an internet connected coffee maker with mic and camera for 60 bucks that's freakin' amazing!
          • misnome 19 minutes ago
            I'm pretty sure they'd be happy to swallow the loss when building a one-off device to specifically target you.
            • blibble 16 minutes ago
              defeated by walking into a random shop and picking one off the shelf

              rather than buying it from scamazon

          • doubled112 23 minutes ago
            Would it include a cell radio and SIM card? Or are they hoping for an open WiFi network in range?
        • jlarocco 35 minutes ago
          If Google thought it was okay to hide a microphone, I'm sure less scrutinized companies try to get away with worse. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47303077
        • dylan604 49 minutes ago
          phew, yet another reason it pays off to not be a coffee drinker.
          • Tempest1981 27 minutes ago
            :) I'm sticking with my Aeropress
    • amelius 1 hour ago
      Does your smartphone have a mic?
      • dylan604 51 minutes ago
        You've brought up such a brilliantly useless point to this discussion. I'm really appreciative of your efforts
      • codeulike 38 minutes ago
        Smartphones at least have some semblance of security, whereas iot devices are a free for all
  • exegete 1 hour ago
    “Accidentally” is not accurate. He used AI to inspect the source and found credentials that work in all devices. He also never gained control of anyone else’s devices. He never used the exploit.
    • 55555 1 hour ago
      I didn't read the article but based on the title and subheading I assume they say "accidentally" because he was trying to reverse engineer the communication protocol to use his own device and he did not expect to find something as dumb as master credentials that would work on others' devices.
    • wolrah 58 minutes ago
      "Accidentally" as in his intent was to gain control of his own device but instead discovered what would in a just world be considered criminal levels of either incompetence or indifference to the most basic levels of security in the entire product line.
  • jonplackett 1 hour ago
    Companies this inept really need to get fined.

    Like how many layers of people had to have OKed having the same password for all of them? It’s incompetence on an impressive scale.

    • wolrah 52 minutes ago
      Agreed, this sort of thing should at minimum be considered gross negligence at this point, but because regular consumers who buy these products rarely see and almost never understand these news articles it doesn't really impact sales so the company doesn't care.

      If this discovery was guaranteed to result in meaningful fines companies would get their act together pretty quickly. 7000 counts of negligent exposure of private data (camera/mic feeds) should in a just world be millions of dollars in fines at the least and arguably criminal charges for management.

      • jonplackett 34 minutes ago
        Exactly. If GDPR fines can be so high, then something like this that is pretty much intentionally leaking personal data should be in the same ballpark.
  • charles_f 55 minutes ago
  • Betelbuddy 34 minutes ago
    His code sucks...
  • ghgr 1 hour ago
    > [...] the same credentials that allowed him to see and control his own device also provided access to live camera feeds, microphone audio [...]

    Sorry what? Why would a vacuum cleaner even need a microphone?

    • onli 1 hour ago
      Control by voice? Not that absurd.
      • Telemakhos 1 hour ago
        Audio and video surveillance via robot vacuum is a feature: you can control the vacuum, see and hear the world from its perspective, and spy on your cats. I wish I were kidding.

        https://youtu.be/TltYXEDoong?t=412

  • metalman 1 hour ago
    accidentaly a god, a sucky kinda god, but a god none the less " I command thee to make vanish the minor sins of this world my minions"
    • soopypoos 57 minutes ago
      Go forth, my pretties! Expunge the particulate filth from this wicked, ground-level world muahaha yes clean soon we will be clean