8 comments

  • world2vec 3 minutes ago
    I just finished the book and it did not live up to all its hype. Quite boring, actually.
  • glenstein 3 days ago
    I jumped into the book after hearing all the buzz as it seemed like the big scifi hit of 2025. Killer premise and for the most part the fast pacing works... for the first third or so. But it you can feel the short story anthology vibe as it goes on and becomes practically a disconnected series of vignettes, and even the central idea itself loses cohesion. The Big Bad Thing has so many manifestations that it feels like monster of the week rather than a true full book that holds onto a core sharply executed identity. Less a grand thesis than a series of isolated short form thrills.

    So the long and short of it is, definitely worth it for the first third and dimishing returns after that.

    As for the short film, I think it's great for what it is, gets better and better as it goes and is worth the short watch. Fascinating seeing the visual depictions of the stuff the book talks about both foreground and background.

    • MattPalmer1086 1 hour ago
      I actually liked all of it. It's slightly more cohesive than the original writing on the SCP website, which is structured as a series of short thematically linked reports. I get that style won't appeal to everyone though.

      Still one of the more original bits of sci fi / horror to be published in a while, so a strong recommendation from me!

    • jhbadger 2 hours ago
      I also didn't think it was quite as good as it was hyped to be, but as someone who has long been into the web-based SCP stuff, I did appreciate how the book is introducing SCP to a wider audience.
    • brson 2 hours ago
      I felt similar about the book. The premise was thrilling, but as it went on it seemed to succumb to typical genre tropes, ending didn't deliver.
    • silenced_trope 3 hours ago
      True, the first third had some mystery to it. The rest was kind of mediocre as far as sci-fi goes.
  • decimalenough 1 hour ago
  • Kim_Bruning 3 days ago
    Oh wow, They filmed it! Twice even!

    hn discussion about the written versions

    * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41224225

    A different version by different director/actors:

    * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-IiVeGAydE

    • jojobas 3 minutes ago
      I bet they filmed it way more than twice.
  • coldtea 1 hour ago
    Did anybody else find the original story mediocre stuff? Interesting premise, but neither novel nor that deep. PKD has done 100x with much less.
    • axus 1 minute ago
      My standard for website fiction is lower. When you're unknown, there's less pressure to go through a long editing cycle. Pale and SEEK have been good though.

      Would not consider myself well-read, if I read enough PKD stories I could probably find some mediocre ones; really liked the popular ones I did read.

    • pinkmuffinere 1 hour ago
      I loved the ideas! The premise was novel to me, and I also don't think I've encountered the same idea since (except for in reference to the original story). I'm not a fan of the writing style though. It's very stiff and heavy-handed, as if the writer's only goal is to setup the next twist. But I can't complain that much, it reminds me a lot of my own writing.
    • Nition 1 hour ago
      I really liked it and all the little interesting ideas within it, like the antimimetic worms that live everywhere. I actually found it very creative and clever. However, I didn't think the recent rewrite was as much of an improvement as others seem to. The later parts were improved but I thought some of the padding out of earlier parts arguably came out worse.

      ---

      Edit:

      To give an actual example, Marion's description in the original, from the scene in the video:

      She is turning fifty this year and slowly greying, well on her way out of "petite" towards "little old lady".

      In the updated edition:

      She turns fifty this year. She is diminutive and flint-eyed, very dark-haired but rapidly greying. Today, her hair is strictly pulled back and up into a silver clasp. She wore her good suit for this, one button, very dark grey, with a solid blue blouse underneath. Ankle boots with stout heels, two silver stud earrings in each lobe. Contact lenses, not the usual glasses. On a lanyard around her neck she wears a security pass with a bright orange and red diagonal stripe.

      Two uses of 'very dark' right after each other? And I actually liked how snappy the original was but that might be just me.

      Another line in this first chapter that I love from the original:

      "What…" O5-8 asks carefully, "would happen if we did know?"

      becomes in the new edition:

      "What…" Mahlo asks carefully, "would happen if we did know what happened to him?"

      Why pad that out? It sounds less natural now.

      • johnke 42 minutes ago
        There were also some examples of sloppy editing in the updated edition, like multiple uses of the word "perimetre" which the author acknowledges was an 'incautious find-and-replace from the US English "meter" to UK English "metre"' https://qntm.org/antimemetics#komment6913d2eb6c240
    • pwdisswordfishy 1 hour ago
      Indeed, it works fine as an introduction to a longer series, but on its own feels pretty unfulfilling.

      I think the story where she detains her own husband would work much better in a stand-alone adaptation.

  • lowbloodsugar 3 days ago
    Jasika will always be Astrid from Fringe. In my head, Helen Hunt plays wheeler.
  • jmcgough 2 hours ago
    Read this as "antiemetics" (anti-nausea meds like Zofran) and was very confused for a moment.
  • SideburnsOfDoom 1 hour ago
    Was this authorised by QNTM?
    • GCUMstlyHarmls 45 minutes ago
      I think all SCP content is creative commons share alike (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/), so I don't think he actually needs to -- assuming this is based on SCP and not the book. I know the book had some revisions done to make it legally distinct from the SCP stories for copyright purposes.