I've been relearning trigonometry lately by myself for navigation and astronomy; not for work, just curiosity I guess. One book I've really enjoyed is Heavenly Mathematics by Van Bremmelen. It's a spherical trig textbook, but it's written by a math historian who describes how trigonometry was gradually developed over human history and he discusses its early proofs, methods and applications. I have to confess that the historical approach has really helped me develop a more complete mental picture and appreciation of the math itself. Understanding the "how" and "why" of its development, and seeing the early practical need and implementation for some of this stuff has made the topic a lot more engaging.
It seems like you'd get a lot deeper understanding by doing it that way, and be much more able to adapt the knowledge to the real world, vs only knowing how to solve problems in the exact form they were presented to you. I had so many semesters of undergrad math, did fine, but feel like I took basically nothing from it.
This is a very entertaining hobby to have. Wishing you a lot of fun.
Next stop, making sundials and reading astrolabe.
I was so surprised to know that Chaucer had such interest in the workings of an Astrolabe. It's not much of a surprise if you think that Astrolabe were the pocket GPS, pocket watch, pocket star chart of those times.
This is a great book if you already know good amount of Math. It helps you fit things into a bigger picture. Really appreciate the fact that something like this exists.
Soviet primary and secondary education on math was one of the few good things of the regime.
Culturally, mastery of mathematics, engineering, chess and technical inteligence were a source of social status and prestige.
Yes, an engineer could have been badly paid, he was not free in a liberal sense, be subject to the vagaries of political paranoia waves, but he commanded a certain level of social respect that even good paid engineers in the sillicon valley can hardly imagine. A soviet physicist could be underpaid and constrained by bureaucracy, but being introduced by your parents as a professor of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics or the Steklov Mathematical Institute in your home town give you almost an aura. Kids would look at you and dream of being admitted to secondary institutions like Kolmogorov's boarding school at the Moscow State University.
Given that, it was as likely for people in political positions of power to have a good mathematical background as it is to find a lawyer in the US Capitol.
This book is really fascinating because it contains a surprising amount of Soviet ideology. The authors repeatedly state that mathematics is posterior to the material world, not prior to it. That is, mathematics is just the observation of regularity in the world, particularly those discovered by people working to create things. Contrast this with the still heavily idealistic world of western mathematics, where mathematicians are more likely to sympathize with the notion that numbers are real things somewhere out there whose structures the real world supervenes upon in some way.
Interesting stuff!
Even though I favor the Soviet view of mathematics personally (I do not think numbers "exist" out there independent of the material world), I think this approach hampers the didactic goals of the text and probably hurt Soviet mathematics as well. The examples in the text are all highly concrete (literally things like rubber mats when discussing curvature). This very down to earth style makes the abstract notions of curvature in other contexts (for example, general relativity) more difficult to grasp, in my opinion.
On the other hand, some people prefer strong, material, examples of mathematical ideas. This book definitely provides that. The section on affine maps in terms of fixing the plane of a surveillance airplane photograph is beautifully concrete.
Next stop, making sundials and reading astrolabe.
I was so surprised to know that Chaucer had such interest in the workings of an Astrolabe. It's not much of a surprise if you think that Astrolabe were the pocket GPS, pocket watch, pocket star chart of those times.
I don't that's against code (yet).
Just knowing that the Sun doesn't really rise on the East (barring exceptions) is a fun reward in itself.
Solarigraphy and Analemma tracking are great fun if you have the luxury of an undisturbed access to the skies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solarigraphy
https://archive.org/details/MathematicsItsContentsMethodsAnd...
Culturally, mastery of mathematics, engineering, chess and technical inteligence were a source of social status and prestige.
Yes, an engineer could have been badly paid, he was not free in a liberal sense, be subject to the vagaries of political paranoia waves, but he commanded a certain level of social respect that even good paid engineers in the sillicon valley can hardly imagine. A soviet physicist could be underpaid and constrained by bureaucracy, but being introduced by your parents as a professor of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics or the Steklov Mathematical Institute in your home town give you almost an aura. Kids would look at you and dream of being admitted to secondary institutions like Kolmogorov's boarding school at the Moscow State University.
Given that, it was as likely for people in political positions of power to have a good mathematical background as it is to find a lawyer in the US Capitol.
Interesting stuff!
Even though I favor the Soviet view of mathematics personally (I do not think numbers "exist" out there independent of the material world), I think this approach hampers the didactic goals of the text and probably hurt Soviet mathematics as well. The examples in the text are all highly concrete (literally things like rubber mats when discussing curvature). This very down to earth style makes the abstract notions of curvature in other contexts (for example, general relativity) more difficult to grasp, in my opinion.
On the other hand, some people prefer strong, material, examples of mathematical ideas. This book definitely provides that. The section on affine maps in terms of fixing the plane of a surveillance airplane photograph is beautifully concrete.
https://mirtitles.org/tag/mathematics/